1.17: Quality Control
- Page ID
- 38597
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)
- In establishing the 95% confidence limits for a particular method for a quality control program, one would expect how many test results to fall beyond the limits of allowable variation by chance?:
- one in 95
- one in 5
- one in 10
- one in 20
- one in 30
- A laboratory test has ± 2 SD control limits of ± 5. The mean, target value is 15. How many days was the method out of control during the two week period shown?:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Day | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Value | 11 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 22 | 28 | 15 | 14 | 26 | 14 |
- The 68% confidence limits of a glucose control are 750-850 mg/L. A control and a series of patient specimens are run. The control reads 750 mg/L. If control results must be within ± 2 SD, what action should you take?:
- report out patient results, since control results are within acceptable limits
- repeat the control, since control results are out of control; if repeat results are in control, report out patient results
- repeat both the control and all patient specimens using same methodology
- repeat both the control and all patient specimens using different methodology
- run second control if within range, report patient results
- A medical technologist should never use the pattern of patient results, i.e. abnormal values, as an indicator of instrument performance.
- true
- false
Use the following Key to answer Questions 5-7:
- 1, 2, and 3 are correct
- 1 and 3 are correct
- 2 and 4 are correct
- 4 only is correct
- all are correct
- Which of the following is/are acceptable quality control pool material?
- frozen
- lyophilized
- low temperature liquid
- fresh patient samples
- When performing an analysis on a stat. analyzer, a quality control sample should be run:
- during the first shift
- depending upon the proven stability of the test system
- by each technologist
- usually at least once every 8 hour shift
- If the quality control sample is out of range (>3 SD), the technologist should:
- recalibrate the instrument
- troubleshoot the instrument
- record the out-of-range result on the QC chart
- notify the supervisor if the problem cannot be solved within 30 minutes
- Calibrators may be used as quality control pools if:
- the usual quality control pools are expired
- the usual quality control pools just won’t ‘come in range’
- there is a temporary shortage of the usual quality control pools
- there are no quality control materials that contains the analyte
- never
- Answer
-
- d (p. 390)
- b (p. 391)
- a (p. 346, 391)
- b (p. 392)
- a (p. 388)
- c (p. 387-388, 399)
- e (p. 393)
- d (p. 396)